DeepSeek+Luna Cascade: 78.9% Accuracy at 63% Cost, Beats Luna Alone
zainhas · x · 2026-08-07
A cascade strategy using DeepSeek first, escalating to Luna on verifier failure, achieves 78.9% accuracy on DeepSWE tasks, outperforming Luna alone (67.2%) while costing 63% of Luna's price ($0.385 vs $0.61). The cheap first stage handles half the queue, reserving Luna for harder tasks.
Related event: DeepSeek-V4 Flash Benchmarked: One-Sixth Cost, 80% of Luna's Performance(14 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- ERP•AI launches headless SaaS with $0 seats that bills machines: $1 buys 4,000 record writes — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-16
- FDE-Gym benchmark shows huge gap on real AI delivery tasks: top model scores 0.563 — DeepLethe · 2026-10-16
- Vibe-coded dashboard leaked franchise financials before anyone logged in — shauntrennery · 2026-10-16
- Fintech HR built a sourcing agent on 60,000 past applicants — 30 qualified candidates in a month — G0NZ0BOY · 2026-10-16
- Orchestrating a 100-image portrait of humanity for aliens with ChatGPT, Argon and p5.brush — dx8xb · 2026-10-16
- 3x DGX Spark cluster runs GLM-5.3-Flash locally behind a proxy, 1.75M tokens/day at 119W — Teknium · 2026-10-16