AI Text Detector Pangram Shows No False Positives But Fails Against Modern LLMs
FlorianGallwitz · x · 2026-08-05
The author shares interim results from a study on the AI text detector Pangram. It shows virtually no false positives, but a good modern LLM can easily generate texts that Pangram classifies as human-written.
Related event: Tests Expose Severe Flaws in AI Text Detectors Like Pangram(4 posts)→
More from Models
- 6 luna models put to the drawing test via computer use — results not bad — adonis_singh · 2026-09-23
- Computer use drawing test: Opus vs Astra recreating a reference image — adonis_singh · 2026-09-23
- Early Hands-On: Opus 5.5 Called 'Sooo Good' to Talk To in First Impressions — daniel_mac8 · 2026-09-23
- Model profitability analysis: Opus 5.5 beats Fable 5.1 at half the price, Grok loses on every task — Wsz2020 · 2026-09-23
- MachgenAI Offers Free Minimax H3 Turbo Generations for Accounts With $25+ Balance — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-23
- Researcher: People Who Flex AI Sycophancy Screenshots Tend to Treat Humans Badly — repligate · 2026-09-23