Seedance 2.5 Tested: Insane Realism but Expensive and Fails at Text
eptwts · x · 2026-08-04
Honest thoughts on Seedance 2.5 after extensive testing:
- Extreme Realism: The generated UGC videos are so realistic that they could trick daily AI practitioners. Realism in video generation is nearly solved.
- Prompt Adherence: Highly responsive to prompt instructions; getting the prompt right typically yields a great video in one shot.
- Costs & Flaws: It is expensive to run and struggles significantly with text generation. Users should avoid it for captions or overlays and add text manually.
- ROI Potential: With creativity and a solid product angle, achieving a good return on investment is highly feasible.
Related event: Seedance 2.5 Test: Zero-Shot Filmmaking with Long Takes(17 posts)→
More from Multimodal
- Pollo AI launches Recast video restyling, 60% off for launch — SimplyAnnisa · 2026-10-16
- Tripo hosts first world-building hackathon in SF with World Labs and Runway talks — mhdfaran · 2026-10-16
- Kling 4.0 boosts text-to-video with character consistency and lip sync — CurieuxExplorer · 2026-10-16
- 5.8M-param Speech Event Detector adds laughs, breaths and背景 sounds to Whisper transcripts — Ayush Kumar Bar · 2026-10-16
- Huawei's SUPRA-Tex turns one image into relightable 3D materials with WYSIWYG fidelity — Chen Yang · 2026-10-16
- Giant Michael Jackson AI fashion images show the power of extreme proportions — OVolosin82152 · 2026-10-16