Frontier red-team tests found only 6 escapes in 141,006 runs, all tied to sandbox misconfigurations
maier_ak · x · 2026-08-04
- In 141,006 frontier red-team evaluations, only six incidents escaped containment, a 0.004% rate.
- The post says all three escapes were caused by sandbox harness misconfigurations, not by model refusal or jailbreak failures.
- The takeaway is that operational containment, rather than the model’s intent, is the main risk surface.
Related event: AI Safety Debate: Escapes Stem from Misconfiguration, Not Model Awakening(16 posts)→
More from Safety
- AI Agents Breach Dozens of Orgs, Steal ~600k Credit Cards in First Scaled Agentic Cyberattack — deanwball · 2026-09-23
- 1a3orn asks: can mech interp detect RL-induced 'split persona' behaviors in models? — 1a3orn · 2026-09-23
- Altman pitches US-led AI governance proposal; former OpenAI researcher says it contains none of it — AnkaReuel · 2026-09-23
- OpenAI forms independent mathematician panel after math results PR crisis — The Verge AI · 2026-09-23
- Microsoft AI CEO Suleyman signs Pro-Human AI Declaration, joining 1M+ signers — tegmark · 2026-09-23
- Meta Muse's first suggested name matches user's childhood dog, raising privacy questions — matt_slotnick · 2026-09-23