AI-written ideas should be disclosed, not passed off as your own
0xSammy · x · 2026-08-04
A discussion of new norms for AI-written work and how people should respond when others outsource thinking to models.
The core argument is that if you ask someone else to do work, you should first show some proof that you did what you could yourself. More broadly, sending someone ideas written by AI without clearly disclosing authorship is considered rude, and people who pass off AI-plagiarized work as their own should face social blowback.
Related event: Scholars Call for New Etiquette on Disclosing AI Assistance(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- An AGI that cannot handle a four-way live conversation is too watered down, says one post — alexisgallagher · 2026-08-04
- Censorship could make permission matter more than intelligence — PierceLilholt · 2026-08-04
- Toby Walsh to launch new AGI risk book in Mosman on September 11 — TobyWalsh · 2026-08-04
- Math still matters because theorem proving trains the kind of reasoning AI-era life needs — jxmnop · 2026-08-04
- Misread alignment debate centers on whether GPT-3/4 work was already relevant to AGI — geoffreyirving · 2026-08-04
- Most knowledge workers are still in the chatbot phase, not the agent phase — manosaie · 2026-08-04