Researchers debate whether a paper really cites IMLE that early, then shift to search compute costs
YouJiacheng · x · 2026-08-04
A thread pushes back on the claim that the paper “cites IMLE within the first two paragraphs of the approach section.” The author argues that this is misleading because there are 5.5 pages of intro/background before the method section, and that those pages are a normal place for prior work.
They also note that the first mention of IMLE is just a bracketed citation [33–35] without naming it, and that the first explicit mention of IMLE [34] appears only on page 31. In the reply, the discussion shifts to a more substantive point: search adds extra compute, so its compute-scaling properties deserve study.
Related event: IMLE Perspectives, Search Generalization, and Citation Controversy(5 posts)→
More from Research
- Wayve launches GAIA-4 to test end-to-end autonomy safety at scale — bdsqlsz · 2026-08-04
- SkillHone keeps full decision history to push agent scores up on GAIA by 15.8 — jiqizhixin · 2026-08-04
- Post-training LLMs feel like one-function, one-reward work that scales up — ivan_bezdomny · 2026-08-04
- SemiAnalysis says modular datacenters are now the default for AWS, Meta and more — bookwormengr · 2026-08-04
- A 50-question LLM interview guide covers tokenization, LoRA, RAG, and MoE — techNmak · 2026-08-04
- Explorative Modeling worsens likelihood but improves low-step text diffusion sampling — dejanseo · 2026-08-04