NeurIPS AC says reviewers ask for rebuttals but often ignore clarification requests
prajdabre · x · 2026-08-04
In a NeurIPS 2026 E&D track context, the author complains that many reviewers do not respond to clarification requests, even though they expect authors to reply to rebuttals.
The point is a process critique: if reviewers want authors to engage seriously, reviewers themselves should also be accountable and responsive. The post frames this as a broader issue of reviewer responsibility and conference etiquette.
More from Research
- A visual explainer breaks down what embedding models are and where they are used — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-08-04
- A neurosymbolic model is pitched as a way to build ultra-reliable numerical solvers — GaryMarcus · 2026-08-04
- Claude Code Under the Hood: System Prompts Exceed 75%, Size Surges — ClaudeCodeLog · 2026-08-04
- Self-distillation from production traces could make models improve with use — ypatil125 · 2026-08-04
- A new reading list links refactoring economics, agent skills, and Google’s Agent Skills — rseroter · 2026-08-04
- A well-executed PhD full of negative results should still be defendable — prajdabre · 2026-08-04