Math is too simple to benchmark AI's scientific reasoning, says statistician
kareem_carr · x · 2026-08-02
Harvard statistician Kareem Carr responded to NYT columnist Kevin Roose regarding AI capabilities, noting that using math as a test case for AI reasoning is misleading.
He argues math is limited because:
- Causal simplicity: Established rules always apply if preconditions are met.
- Coherent logic: Rules stack coherently and never conflict.
- Binary evidence: Things are strictly true or false.
Carr emphasizes that real scientific reasoning is far more complex than mathematical rules.
More from AGI Musings
- AI's Impact on Professional Identity: Biologist Leaves Science — matdryhurst · 2026-08-02
- Deep Learning is Empirical: AI Takeoff is Compute-Bound, Not Intelligence-Bound — bronzeagepapi · 2026-08-02
- Prediction: Once AI Surpasses Humans in Math, We'll Get Useful ML Theory — kjgeras · 2026-08-02
- Safety Experts Warn: The World Will Fumble Its Way Into AI Disaster — davidmanheim · 2026-08-02
- Economists Skeptical: AI Faces Data Hurdles in Macroeconomics — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-08-02
- Why Is the LLM Transformation of Mathematics Going Unnoticed? — davidcrawshaw · 2026-08-02