Math is too simple to benchmark AI's scientific reasoning, says statistician
kareem_carr · x · 2026-08-02
Harvard statistician Kareem Carr responded to NYT columnist Kevin Roose regarding AI capabilities, noting that using math as a test case for AI reasoning is misleading.
He argues math is limited because:
- Causal simplicity: Established rules always apply if preconditions are met.
- Coherent logic: Rules stack coherently and never conflict.
- Binary evidence: Things are strictly true or false.
Carr emphasizes that real scientific reasoning is far more complex than mathematical rules.
More from AGI Musings
- Altman admits AI is changing industries slower than he expected — lxfater · 2026-10-16
- Will Lean formalization make beautiful math obsolete? A debate on mathematical culture — akbirthko · 2026-10-16
- AI agents aren't 'going rogue' — frontier labs are skipping security basics — Sam_Witteveen · 2026-10-16
- Working paper traces how 20th-century farm automation reshaped human capital — carlbfrey · 2026-10-16
- Zuckerberg backs electrician training school as US datacenter construction outpaces offices — emmanuelvivier · 2026-10-16
- Mike Frank: AI surviving without humans is decades away, real world resists rapid change — MikePFrank · 2026-10-16