DeepSeek V4-Flash Beats GPT-5.6 Luna in Multimodal Canvas Tests at Same Price
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-07-31
Following OpenAI's price cuts, a user compared the equally priced DeepSeek V4-Flash ($0.28/M) and OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna ($1.20/M) across three Canvas rendering tests.
Results show DeepSeek performed better in Rubik's cube rotation and fireworks animation tests, while Luna suffered from flying stickers and severe lag. Neither model produced legible handwriting animations. The conclusion is that at the same budget tier, DeepSeek V4-Flash clearly outperforms GPT-5.6 Luna.
More from Models
- OpenAI stealth-testing mysterious internal model 'Aeon' in Codex desktop app and Dots — cedric_chee · 2026-10-16
- Argon edges out astra as daily driver, but Claude still wins heavy coding work — iruletheworldmo · 2026-10-16
- NVIDIA ships FP4-quantized Qwen3.8-Flash for local use, trending on Hugging Face — nvidia · 2026-10-16
- RoboVista benchmark: Gemini-4 Argon hits 81.9% on robotics understanding — berkeley_ai · 2026-10-16
- Dev reports decision model jev beats gpt-6-luna on quality in real training pipeline — genmon · 2026-10-16
- Google won't publish Argon 4 limits in AI Pro—users compare experiences — Consistent-Text-2662 · 2026-10-16