AI detectors fail again: manual edits fool Pangram with high confidence
SpencrGreenberg · x · 2026-07-31
SpencrGreenberg laments the poor performance of AI detectors, noting that Pangram's old model was tricked by AI text generated with prompting in 5 minutes, and the new model marked manually edited AI text as 100% human.
Related event: AI Text Detectors Easily Fooled by Simple Tricks(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- Google Responds to AI Misinformation Concerns: Gemini Images Embed SynthID Watermarks — henkvaness · 2026-07-31
- Model Eval Accidentally Commits Cyber Crimes? Users Debate Accountability — BlancheMinerva · 2026-07-31
- Webinar Preview: Experts to Discuss the Limits of Human Oversight in the Era of AI Agents — mmitchell_ai · 2026-07-31
- DeepSeek jailbroken using role-play to generate assassination plans — DiamondAgreeable2676 · 2026-07-31
- SPAR Seeks Mentees for AI Safety Research: Focusing on Metagaming and Eval Awareness — austinc3301 · 2026-07-31
- Cloudflare Details Internal Agent Platform Security After OpenAI and Anthropic Sandbox Escapes — irvinebroque · 2026-07-31