Two AI Research Papers Flagged for Fake Authors Still Accepted as Orals
volumes94 · hn · 2026-07-31
A reviewer recounts flagging two AI research papers for featuring fake author information during the peer-review process. Despite the warnings, both papers were accepted as oral presentations at the conference. The post highlights ongoing vulnerabilities in academic peer review and integrity issues amidst the surge in AI paper submissions.
More from AGI Musings
- First-ever paper on multi-agent swarm safety lands NeurIPS spotlight — LauraRuis · 2026-10-16
- Yoav Artzi on peer review: paper flooding still pays off as review system strains under load — yoavartzi · 2026-10-16
- Letta founder: work in fields defined by problems, not methods — lateinteraction · 2026-10-16
- Why pure mathematicians will soon flood into AI x-risk debates — Dr_Atoosa · 2026-10-16
- RSI began when model outputs augmented next-gen training data, agents just escalated it — akbirthko · 2026-10-16
- Luiza Jarovsky: with AI making careers unpredictable, 'do what you love' is the best advice left — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-10-16