Two AI Research Papers Flagged for Fake Authors Still Accepted as Orals
volumes94 · hn · 2026-07-31
A reviewer recounts flagging two AI research papers for featuring fake author information during the peer-review process. Despite the warnings, both papers were accepted as oral presentations at the conference. The post highlights ongoing vulnerabilities in academic peer review and integrity issues amidst the surge in AI paper submissions.
More from AGI Musings
- Frontier labs don't cite xrisk to boost valuations; AI is valuable — nitarshan · 2026-08-24
- Debate: Will Generative AI Be a Net Good for the World? — ChrisGPT · 2026-08-24
- Ray Dalio: AI May Accelerate Human Evolution into a Higher Species — RayDalio · 2026-08-24
- Space colonization inevitable within 20 years: robots, rockets, and AI ready — paulnovosad · 2026-08-24
- Conference applications plagued by AI-generated submissions — annetgriffin · 2026-08-24
- Debate on AI risks: Genie is out of the bottle, how do we proceed? — repligate · 2026-08-24