Testing Pangram AI Detector: Easily Fooled by Sandwiching AI Text
jdjohnson · x · 2026-07-31
A user tested the highly-discussed AI text detector Pangram AI and found its results to be highly inconsistent. The test revealed that if AI-generated paragraphs are sandwiched between human-written openings and closings, the system misidentifies the entire text as "100% human." However, isolating the middle AI paragraphs triggers a "100% AI" detection. The user questioned the meaningfulness of using such tools in practical scenarios.
Related event: AI Text Detectors Easily Fooled by Simple Tricks(3 posts)→
More from Apps
- ChatGPT Work Autonomously Clones Voice and Produces 12-Episode Podcast — nickbaumann_ · 2026-08-01
- ChatGPT Search Ditches Bing for Its Own Index, Study Finds — gaganghotra_ · 2026-08-01
- OpenAI Criticized for Odd Toggle Interface Pattern in Primary Navigation — floguo · 2026-08-01
- Experienced AI Builder Reveals a 'Holy Shit' Moment About the Future of UI — genmon · 2026-08-01
- Google's 24/7 Spark Agent Tested: Keeps Working While Device is Closed — Planhub-ca · 2026-08-01
- Atomic-Chat: An Open-Source Local AI Assistant That Runs 100% Offline — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-08-01