Testing Pangram AI Detector: Easily Fooled by Sandwiching AI Text
jdjohnson · x · 2026-07-31
A user tested the highly-discussed AI text detector Pangram AI and found its results to be highly inconsistent. The test revealed that if AI-generated paragraphs are sandwiched between human-written openings and closings, the system misidentifies the entire text as "100% human." However, isolating the middle AI paragraphs triggers a "100% AI" detection. The user questioned the meaningfulness of using such tools in practical scenarios.
Related event: AI Text Detectors Easily Fooled by Simple Tricks(3 posts)→
More from Apps
- Consumer AI Battle Is for the 'One Agent to Rule Them All', Analyst Ben Bajarin Argues — BenBajarin · 2026-09-23
- LinkedIn's Days Could Be Numbered If an Agent Unlocks Your Raw Data, Argues Annette Griffin — annetgriffin · 2026-09-23
- Alexandr Wang Praises Consumer AI Agent Muse That Saved a User $17 on Their Wireless Bill — alexandr_wang · 2026-09-23
- DeepSeek's Android client for Llama earns praise from developers — haydendevs · 2026-09-23
- Toddler's interactive storybook built in two hours with an agent workflow — mimi10v3 · 2026-09-23
- AC units stolen, AI agent Muse files police report, insurance claim and repair quotes — armand_ruiz · 2026-09-23