DeepMind Paper: LLMs Could Derive Relativity But Fail to Invent It From Data
rohanpaul_ai · x · 2026-07-30
A Google DeepMind position paper examines the limits of LLMs in scientific discovery by separating the process into induction, deduction, and abduction.
Using Einstein's development of General Relativity as a case study, the authors note that Newtonian gravity had almost no empirical error signal (inertial and gravitational mass agreed to 10⁻⁹). A compression-driven system relying on fitting data would find little gradient to rebuild spacetime. Einstein’s breakthrough relied on conceptual conflicts and thought experiments—an abductive jump from experience to a new explanatory premise.
The paper suggests that while LLMs can derive consequences from supplied axioms, they struggle with true invention. The proposed direction involves action-controllable world models, allowing agents to intervene in physically consistent simulations and translate that experience into candidate axioms.
More from AGI Musings
- Should AI Be a Delegate or Trustee? EACL Paper Reveals Alignment Trade-offs — xuanalogue · 2026-07-30
- Workplace Truth in the AI Era: Your Job is Adult Daycare — whatsallthiss · 2026-07-30
- Ben Thompson on the Economics of Frontier Models and Open Source Disadvantages — ppooooooooopp · 2026-07-30
- AI Detection Tools Are Ineffective: Criticizing the Bias Against Generated Text — l4rz · 2026-07-30
- With Moats Gone, Why Are Hundreds of AI Startups Still Joining Accelerators? — vaibhavbetter · 2026-07-30
- Why AI Doomism Fails: Intelligence is Messy, Not Hyper-Rational — mimi10v3 · 2026-07-30