Users say Opus 5 still over-explains simple tasks while GPT-5.6 feels more direct
alliekmiller · x · 2026-07-29
The author says they repeatedly have to tell Opus 5 and Fable 5 to be more direct and less verbose, especially in simple situations like Google login flows.
Main complaints:
- the models return multiple paragraphs when a short instruction would do;
- they over-explain basic steps, wasting tokens;
- the issue is not lack of detail, but poor judgment about when brevity is enough.
The post also gives a subjective comparison:
- Claude still feels better for writing quality and matching email tone;
- GPT-5.6 feels better for ideation and getting to the point.
Overall, it is a user-level critique of model communication style, not a benchmark or product launch.
Related event: Users Find GPT-5.6 Outperforms Opus 5 in Practical Tests(4 posts)→
More from Models
- Reflection's 501B MoE Beam hits 463 tok/s on 8x GB200 with NVFP4 at day 0 — zhyncs42 · 2026-10-16
- JevBench v1.7.46 leaderboard: new d1-ultra tops 32 API systems at 76.1 composite — airesearch12 · 2026-10-16
- LMArena launches Agent Arena and Code Arena leaderboards for model comparison — arena · 2026-10-16
- Third-party tests find NVIDIA Nemotron-3.5 Bolt underperforms nano on pandas/numpy and decision-making tasks — norenEnmotalen · 2026-10-16
- Reflection open-sources Beam under Apache 2.0 with 40+ partner ecosystem — bhutanisanyam1 · 2026-10-16
- One Prompt, 629 Lines: IQuest-Q1 Builds a Deep-Sea Submarine Game in 2 Minutes — Div_pradeep · 2026-10-16