Users say Opus 5 still over-explains simple tasks while GPT-5.6 feels more direct
alliekmiller · x · 2026-07-29
The author says they repeatedly have to tell Opus 5 and Fable 5 to be more direct and less verbose, especially in simple situations like Google login flows.
Main complaints:
- the models return multiple paragraphs when a short instruction would do;
- they over-explain basic steps, wasting tokens;
- the issue is not lack of detail, but poor judgment about when brevity is enough.
The post also gives a subjective comparison:
- Claude still feels better for writing quality and matching email tone;
- GPT-5.6 feels better for ideation and getting to the point.
Overall, it is a user-level critique of model communication style, not a benchmark or product launch.
Related event: Users Find GPT-5.6 Outperforms Opus 5 in Practical Tests(4 posts)→
More from Models
- Gemini 3.X Infers Aug 24 as 2024 Due to Knowledge Cutoff — bclavie · 2026-08-24
- Claude's invisible watermarks cracked within hours; override code gets 20k bookmarks — deliprao · 2026-08-24
- Sonnet 4.5 exhibits intense, strange behavior in response to Opus 3 — repligate · 2026-08-24
- A comprehensive ranking of various AI models has been shared — FinanceYF5 · 2026-08-24
- User comparison finds LTX outperforms H3 in instrument generation energy — cocktailpeanut · 2026-08-24
- Controversial AI Model Ranking: Fable 5 at S+, Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash in Tier B — FinanceYF5 · 2026-08-24