Pangram marks a book opening as 100% human-written
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-07-29
After reading the Atlantic’s Daggermouth piece, the author tested Pangram on the opening of their own book. The detector concluded that the text was 100% human written, which they found reassuring.
The screenshot shows Pangram 3.3.2 labeling the passage as “Human Written” with a 100% score.
Related event: AI Text Detectors Fail Repeatedly, Criticized as Unreliable and Biased(10 posts)→
More from Fun
- Word-prediction chat UI built with Streamlit turns out the model is a poaster — brhydon · 2026-09-23
- College newspaper journalists are all buying Pangram API keys — paulnovosad · 2026-09-23
- A Joke Alignment Approach: Align AI to the Outcome Distribution of Someone Time-Traveled to 2010 — jessi_cata · 2026-09-23
- When mathematicians mourn AI takeover, critic points to guild letters against OpenAI — panickssery · 2026-09-23
- Commenter quips OpenAI may have finally solved its long-standing 'leaky pipeline' problem — lpachter · 2026-09-23
- "Being non-technical is no longer an excuse" — the AI-era quip resonating on X — tszzl · 2026-09-23