TMLR’s Q2 ranking looks too low, says a post praising its fast review process
canaesseth · x · 2026-07-29
A post argues that Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) deserves more respect than its new Q2 ranking suggests.
- The author praises TMLR’s review workflow: scoreless reviews, rebuttal and revision, then scores and decision.
- They say the journal has fast turnaround and a strong review process.
- The main complaint is that the ranking metric may be missing something important about venue quality.
More from Research
- A slide argues Bayes is only one lens, not the theory of modern AI inference — davidmanheim · 2026-07-29
- Brain-inspired AI can plan and solve problems with far less energy, study suggests — striketheviol · 2026-07-29
- From GPT-2 to KimiK3, a thread argues the story is bigger than scale — algo_diver · 2026-07-29
- Synthetic training data helps AI resolve messy dataset citations — RexDouglass · 2026-07-29
- Dynamic multimodal fact-checking benchmarks still hide 17%–29% contamination risk — Haorui He · 2026-07-29
- Paper finds semantic IDs lose fine-grained item detail in generative recommendation — _reachsumit · 2026-07-29