Receipts Behind the 2027 RSI Debate: Kevin Bryan, Chinchilla, METR and AlphaEvolve
imjustnewatai · x · 2026-07-29
This follow-up links the core receipts behind the 2027 RSI discussion: Kevin Bryan’s prior remark that researchers expect a Chinchilla-law-level AI breakthrough in roughly 2027–2029, and the July 2026 METR/Elasticity paper estimating about 9% AI R&D productivity feedback since coding agents arrived versus a modeled 15% threshold for self-sustaining acceleration.
It also points to related context: the original Chinchilla paper, METR’s caveats, and DeepMind’s AlphaEvolve as an example of AI improving algorithms used in AI training.
Related event: AI Researchers Predict Minimal RSI Breakthrough Around 2027(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI's fundamental design flaws are fully hidden by its products' superficial design flaws — lescarr · 2026-10-16
- Can AI trained only on human content infer the shape of the human brain? — rickasaurus · 2026-10-16
- Vals RSI Index extrapolates Google models hitting 130% autonomous AI R&D by Oct 2027 — HaydnBelfield · 2026-10-16
- Gowers' tl;dr: no p(doom), but can't confidently say it's close to zero — michael_nielsen · 2026-10-16
- Fields Medalist Gowers pens long essay: can't confidently say AI extinction risk is near zero — michael_nielsen · 2026-10-16
- Woman arrested for blocking Uber delivery robot in Philadelphia to protest job losses — GarrisonLovely · 2026-10-16