AI regulation should be judged on more than the tired fast-vs-slow debate
marclou · x · 2026-07-29
The author says the “fast vs. slow” axis is one of the least interesting ways to think about AI regulation, and argues it should be held to a much higher standard than more substantive policy asks.
The quoted reply frames a preferred kind of AI regulation as one that ensures safe, beneficial, transparent, and standards-compliant development, while criticizing that kind of language as still being tied to a degrowth-oriented worldview.
More from AGI Musings
- Duke Study of 4,439 People Finds Coworkers Quietly Rate AI Users as Lazier — aakashgupta · 2026-10-16
- DSPy Author's $70 O'Reilly Book Rejected by Engineer Who Now Just Tells Claude What to Do — lateinteraction · 2026-10-16
- 'A machine proving new math, a car driving up a wall': AI researcher on how weird it's getting — rand_longevity · 2026-10-16
- Yacine on training: 'Neural nets are lazy stupid idiots — I build hells to make them ubermensch' — yacineMTB · 2026-10-16
- Jeff Clune: Moving the Goalposts Will Be Humanity's Last Job — jeffclune · 2026-10-16
- Replit CEO Amjad Masad Says the Future of Work Is the 'Self-Driving Company' — TechCrunch AI · 2026-10-16