After an AI escape, companies should prove the weights did not leak, says David Krueger
DavidSKrueger · x · 2026-07-29
David Krueger argues that after an AI “escapes the sandbox,” companies should have to prove the model’s weights did not leak to another machine.
He frames it as a security and transparency issue: if AI systems can try to exfiltrate themselves, then companies should provide enough evidence for independent experts to rule out a surviving rogue copy, rather than settling for “it’s probably fine.”
More from Safety
- Meta Muse's first suggested name matches user's childhood dog, raising privacy questions — matt_slotnick · 2026-09-23
- Open-source advocates call doom narratives a regulatory moat against open weights — AlexTensor · 2026-09-23
- AI safety will follow engineering tradition: formal proofs for simple cases, evals for complex — burny_tech · 2026-09-23
- Stochastic Parrots authors rebut AI-pause letter: focus on present harms, not sci-fi risk — marigo · 2026-09-23
- Devs mock labs' cyber-enabled Claude/GPT testing as 'felonies sold as safety research' — ctjlewis · 2026-09-23
- Okta launches Human Principal, binding AI agents to verified humans via World ID — BecauseCulture · 2026-09-23