Miles Brundage says frontier AI auditing tools exist, but more governance work is needed
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-07-29
Miles Brundage says a lot of the needed technical and governance machinery for frontier AI oversight already exists, but more still has to be built, and skepticism is reasonable.
The reply frames one reason for pushing independent frontier AI auditing: if AI companies face costly safety and security requirements, auditors can help verify that competitors are making similar investments, reducing the incentive to race ahead alone. Brundage says he will say more soon about the state of the field and next steps.
Related event: Ex-OpenAI Expert Advocates for Independent Frontier AI Audits(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- 'Refusing to code with AI in 2026 is like refusing Google in 2005' — prasenx · 2026-10-16
- Bessemer survey of 226 healthcare execs: back-office AI returns 3-4x, clinical AI lags — AllThingsApx · 2026-10-16
- SAIR Launches Open Math OS, Offering Free Compute and 100+ Tools for Community-Owned Math AI — Thom_Wolf · 2026-10-16
- 'Human in the loop' called one of AI governance's biggest lies: presence isn't authority — glenbeer · 2026-10-16
- Interpretability debate: 'all concepts are arbitrary' dismissal called the default doomer prior — basedjensen · 2026-10-16
- "Flyers or Liars": the Wright Brothers' 1908 European skeptics as a lens on AI ambition today — bennash · 2026-10-16