User says Opus 5 ignores tools, breaks workflows, and feels overly ignorant
omarsar0 · x · 2026-07-29
The poster says they stopped using Opus 5 after only a few sessions because it felt overly "ignorant" in practice.
According to the post, the model did things that were not requested, ignored custom skills and tools, and broke existing workflows and loops. The author concludes that the model feels weird and disappointing so far.
Related event: Claude Opus 5 Criticized: Unstable as Coding Agent, Breaks Workflows(5 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- 10 open-source repos that let your AI agent reverse-engineer apps and games — victor_explore · 2026-10-16
- The new CTO job: agent management and QA loops, 'cable management' instead of coding — HankYeomans · 2026-10-16
- Why company AI agents go stale: adoption needs in-house knowledge, not just better agents — EdenEmarco177 · 2026-10-16
- Open-source MCP lets coding agents search Obsidian's 9,000-plugin directory before reinventing wheels — pitfa19 · 2026-10-16
- Cheng Lou open-sources Handwired: hand-written weights turn code into training-free neural nets — dotey · 2026-10-16
- Building a portable context vault in Notion so every AI agent knows you from day one — ivanhzhao · 2026-10-16