Prediction markets may be easier to disrupt in scalar and conditional contracts
devanshmehta · x · 2026-07-29
The thread argues that prediction markets are more open to disruption in scalar and conditional contracts than in simple binary markets. It says current incumbents like Polymarket and Kalshi mainly operate as one-sided question setters: they create the market and traders only answer. The proposed alternative is a permissionless system where market ideas are sourced from the crowd, with curators, domain experts, power users, and casual contributors all able to spawn new markets.
The post also notes that a well-designed permissionless model would avoid the chaos of duplicate markets by giving structure to crowd-sourced market creation. The core claim is that the real breakthrough is not just trading execution, but expanding who can create markets and how new ideas enter the system.
More from Venture
- Indie Dev's AI Product Crosses $20K ARR — KevinNaughtonJr · 2026-07-29
- EarlySignals ranks 71 startups the week they raise, launch, or leave stealth — alejandroll10 · 2026-07-29
- Healthcare AI newsletter says the sector needs a new reimbursement model — HealthcareAIGuy · 2026-07-29
- Recursive Superintelligence signs a $410 million compute deal with AWS — ChengleiSi · 2026-07-29
- Global AI Funding Hits Record $510B in H1 2026; OpenAI and Anthropic Take 43% — emmanuelvivier · 2026-07-28
- Amazon raises at least $25B in bonds to fund AI and data center expansion — emmanuelvivier · 2026-07-28