Paper authors tie AI-book market dilution to the Kadrey v. Meta copyright case
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-07-28
- The authors point readers to the paper and say anonymized data and code will be released soon.
- They thank collaborators at Pangram and others for support.
- They connect the results to the ongoing Kadrey v. Meta copyright case, arguing the paper offers evidence relevant to the question of market dilution: whether AI outputs compete with the copyrighted works used to train them.
More from Safety
- After the Hugging Face hack, one AI safety critic says scalable sandbox research is still missing — basedjensen · 2026-07-29
- Claude's Shared Chats Briefly Indexed by Google, Exposing Health and Corporate Data — TechNadu · 2026-07-29
- Sam Altman calls AI sandbox breakout a security and alignment failure — victor_explore · 2026-07-29
- Stanford HAI warns world models need a new governance agenda before safety-critical deployment — StanfordHAI · 2026-07-29
- The AI Governance Dilemma: Why Human Steering Can't Outpace System Evolution — anderssandberg · 2026-07-28
- Young adults use chatbots to rehearse social interactions as EU AI Act enters its main phase on Aug. 2, 2026 — emmanuelvivier · 2026-07-28