Kimi-K3 hosts appear locked into identical pricing as providers compete on latency
TheZachMueller · x · 2026-07-28
Last week’s warning about Kimi-K3 token pricing appears to have been accurate: large inference providers are all charging the same rates.
The claim is that Moonshot’s license requires separate agreements with large inference providers, including restrictions on the price they can offer the model at so they can’t undercut Moonshot. As a result, providers are competing on latency and throughput instead of price. The attached chart shows the same $3 input / $15 output pricing across multiple hosts, with different latency, throughput, and uptime numbers.
More from Infra
- Search API pricing looks cheap per call, but full-context queries can cost 4× more — No_Marionberry_5366 · 2026-07-28
- Pentagon reportedly moves to build hyperscale AI data centers on a dozen bases — Polymarket · 2026-07-28
- Open-source proxy stops agent loops, caps budget, and blocks risky tool calls — Electrical-War-549 · 2026-07-28
- FT screenshots show AI chip optimism and a sharp sell-off in the same day — nathanbenaich · 2026-07-28
- Alphabet’s estimated 12-month capex jumps to $250B as the AI race heats up — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-28
- Samsung chip workers are leaving for SK Hynix as $476,000 HBM bonuses lure talent — nordicinst · 2026-07-28