Who keeps human values relevant when AI starts defining “optimal” decisions?
PierceLilholt · x · 2026-07-28
A short prompt about alignment and governance: who makes sure human values do not get left behind when AI starts defining what counts as “optimal”? It is less a statement than a framing question about value trade-offs in a future AI-driven decision system.
More from AGI Musings
- A Verse code corpus could reshape pretraining, but a model-specific rubric may poison it — mike64_t · 2026-07-28
- The phrase “Artificial Superintelligence” may be losing steam, prompting new AI-era labels — kellerjordan0 · 2026-07-28
- Sebastien Bubeck calls AI the most profound scientific revolution in a century — danintheory · 2026-07-28
- A Reddit thread asks whether AI could prove consciousness via the double-slit test — writerme1 · 2026-07-28
- AI models will become every company’s new website, but data flywheels will decide the winners — aigclink · 2026-07-28
- Anduril’s containerized data center can be deployed by two people in under 10 minutes — damianplayer · 2026-07-28