AI company accused in court of destroying books after training on them
ns123abc · x · 2026-07-28
A repost reacting to an alleged open-court admission that an AI company destroyed books and manuscripts after extracting their contents for model training.
The quoted claim is framed as evidence in a dispute over how training data is sourced and handled, especially when the materials are unique or hard to replace. The post itself is mainly an outrage reaction, but the underlying issue is the legal and governance question of whether training practices can involve destroying source materials after digitization or extraction.
More from Safety
- Agent actions need checks outside the model: NVIDIA demos lean on guardrails amid wave of real agent incidents — Creamy-And-Crowded · 2026-10-16
- Vitalik builds "paranoid mode" agent wrapper with Tor, zkAPI and local prompt rewriting — DavideCrapis · 2026-10-16
- Security team demos Signal 1-click exploit technique at Hexacon Paris — moyix · 2026-10-16
- China moves to impose registration and licensing on frontier AI model weights and chip designs — deanwball · 2026-10-16
- Same agent task, two auth models: shared admin login wipes 1M audit rows, per-agent identity gets refused — Prompt Engineering · 2026-10-16
- Binding agent approvals to exact content: a synthetic test for stale permissions — Crescitaly · 2026-10-16