Clean Code author: I trust agent-written code only after tests and constraints
SantiDev · hn · 2026-07-28
Robert Martin says he no longer reviews code written by his agents line by line. Instead, he relies on a tight gauntlet of constraints — unit tests, gherkin tests, QA procedures, quality metrics, mutation testing, and coverage — so the agents have to prove correctness before he trusts the output.
The post frames agent coding as a system-design problem: build guardrails around the runtime, make the scripts read-only, and let the verification stack do the heavy lifting. It’s positioned as a practical template for people building local agents, memory systems, MCP tools, RAG pipelines, or other agent workflows.
More from coding & agent
- PIRL adds closed-loop verification to RL post-training and improves accuracy on reasoning and code tasks — This_Ad9834 · 2026-07-28
- MyClaw pitches 30-second setup and 24/7 hosting for AI agents — manishkhosiya · 2026-07-28
- Microsoft open-sources a governance toolkit for autonomous AI agents — microsoft · 2026-07-28
- A Python repo turns technical book PDFs into Claude Code skills — virgiliojr94 · 2026-07-28
- Hugging Face open-sources a local speech-to-speech voice-agent stack — huggingface · 2026-07-28
- New APIs let agents react to real-world events in real time — jarrodwatts · 2026-07-28