LTX 2.3 Runs 6× Faster Than Wan 2.2, But Wan Wins on Motion Quality
writer_coder_06 · reddit · 2026-07-27
Benchmark results
The author compares LTX 2.3 and Wan 2.2 on a 5-second 720p video generation task.
Key findings
- LTX shows about a 6x speed advantage at the midpoint of the test.
- Wan appears stronger on motion quality, anatomy, and face consistency.
- LTX starts to drift on faces once the camera movement goes beyond a slow pan.
- A 6GB VRAM card can run LTX-2.3 at 720p/10s, while Wan tops out around 480p/5s.
- License differences matter: Wan uses Apache 2.0, while LTX uses a community license that requires companies above $10M revenue to pay for it.
Methodology
The author links to a longer write-up with the benchmark setup and numbers.
Related event: LTX 2.3 vs Wan 2.2: Video Generation Benchmark(2 posts)→
More from Multimodal
- Third-party test: Claude Opus 5.5 renders finer 3D scenes but costs 13x more than GPT-6 Sol — testingcatalog · 2026-09-23
- ComfyUI trick: aux preprocessor + Qwen transfers poses across characters with one prompt — Acceptable-Work8202 · 2026-09-23
- Same portrait prompt across Midjourney V6.1, V7 and V8.2: do older models look better? — tisch_eins · 2026-09-23
- Testing AI character consistency across a 20-image travel sequence — SiennaVaire · 2026-09-23
- Midjourney v8.2 Faces: New Portrait Generation Samples Shared — azed_ai · 2026-09-23
- One-sentence prompt generates lifelike dog video, shown side-by-side with the real one — wgrathwohl · 2026-09-23