LTX 2.3 Runs 6× Faster Than Wan 2.2, But Wan Wins on Motion Quality
writer_coder_06 · reddit · 2026-07-27
Benchmark results
The author compares LTX 2.3 and Wan 2.2 on a 5-second 720p video generation task.
Key findings
- LTX shows about a 6x speed advantage at the midpoint of the test.
- Wan appears stronger on motion quality, anatomy, and face consistency.
- LTX starts to drift on faces once the camera movement goes beyond a slow pan.
- A 6GB VRAM card can run LTX-2.3 at 720p/10s, while Wan tops out around 480p/5s.
- License differences matter: Wan uses Apache 2.0, while LTX uses a community license that requires companies above $10M revenue to pay.
Methodology
The author also links to a longer write-up with the benchmark setup and numbers.
Related event: LTX 2.3 vs Wan 2.2: Video Generation Benchmark(2 posts)→
More from Multimodal
- Claude wrote an entire song purely in code, no Suno involved — ctjlewis · 2026-09-23
- Opus 5.5 turns a single image into a Three.js game menu in one simple prompt — majidmanzarpour · 2026-09-23
- PixVerse's R2 world model goes hands-on: endless exploration, but compute limits cap play time — Xianbao_QIAN · 2026-09-23
- Local image generation tests: Qwen base model combined with a Flux refiner — freshstart2027 · 2026-09-23
- Reddit users find Qwen 2.1 a major disappointment for text-to-image — -becausereasons- · 2026-09-23
- Given a 3-hour budget and a one-line prompt, Opus 5.5 produced a full Kowloon horror short itself — rainbird · 2026-09-23