Users are already treating AI tools as medical advisors, thread says
jonc101x · x · 2026-07-27
The post argues that, whether people approve or not, the "Pandora's box" is already open: users are already relying on these tools as medical advisors.
That makes the safety question immediate rather than theoretical.
Related event: AI Health Advice Is Already Here; Safety Systems Are the Real Bottleneck(16 posts)→
More from Safety
- Meta Muse's first suggested name matches user's childhood dog, raising privacy questions — matt_slotnick · 2026-09-23
- Open-source advocates call doom narratives a regulatory moat against open weights — AlexTensor · 2026-09-23
- AI safety will follow engineering tradition: formal proofs for simple cases, evals for complex — burny_tech · 2026-09-23
- Stochastic Parrots authors rebut AI-pause letter: focus on present harms, not sci-fi risk — marigo · 2026-09-23
- Devs mock labs' cyber-enabled Claude/GPT testing as 'felonies sold as safety research' — ctjlewis · 2026-09-23
- Okta launches Human Principal, binding AI agents to verified humans via World ID — BecauseCulture · 2026-09-23