Model chart pits Opus 5, Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 against cost and coding scores
haider1 · x · 2026-07-27
A post argues that Opus 5 is significantly more cost-efficient than Fable 5, while calling Sonnet 5 a poor release because it costs more and uses more tokens than GPT-5.6 Sol.
The attached chart compares several models across intelligence, coding, and agentic indices, along with cost per task and tokens per task. The poster says GPT-5.6 Sol remains the everyday workhorse even compared with Opus 5.
More from Models
- Anthropic’s Opus 5 hits 30% on ARC-AGI-3, but loses its edge on a held-out puzzle suite — NathanpmYoung · 2026-07-27
- A thread argues serious Opus 3 use becomes a superpower as models improve — repligate · 2026-07-27
- Sam Altman says the next six months of model progress will outpace the last two years — ycombinator · 2026-07-27
- Would a $5/month coding-model plan beat Claude and Codex at $20/month? — athsrva · 2026-07-27
- Poster says Kimi’s near-term outlook depends on a K3 base model release — _xjdr · 2026-07-27
- Kimi K3 may be strong on cyber, but token efficiency keeps it off UK AISIS — teortaxesTex · 2026-07-27