A chip-packaging comparison shows DF2000 taking a more advanced stacking approach
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-07-27
- A reply highlights a comparison of bonding technologies, interconnect pitch, stack height, and overall die layout.
- It notes that DF1000 and DeepVerse bonding look very similar, while DF2000 appears more advanced because it places chipsets beneath the DRAM dies.
- The post also says A4E uses wafer-to-wafer (W2W) bonding rather than die-to-die (D2D), and that HBM does not stack on logic.
- The reaction is that the design choices are a good example of “necessity is the mother of invention.”
More from Infra
- WEKA NeuralMesh is said to match HBM3 bandwidth on GPU servers — AccBalanced · 2026-07-27
- Nvidia gets mocked as “the leading open-source AI company” while repo chart shows it ahead — AccBalanced · 2026-07-27
- $8 ESP32-S3 runs a 28.9M-parameter LLM fully offline at 9.5 tokens per second — yangyi · 2026-07-27
- YC talk on BCI x AI says infrastructure is what really determines speed — garrytan · 2026-07-27
- A 13B model ran on a no-GPU PC by paging weights from SSD via llama.cpp — ID_R_McGregor · 2026-07-27
- llama.cpp warns that GGUFs made before a recent change must be regenerated — EconomySerious · 2026-07-27