Opus 5 Struggles in Complex Tasks While Fable Shows Deeper Reasoning
doodlestein · x · 2026-07-27
A developer observed in hands-on testing that Opus 5 underperforms in complex scenarios compared to Fable. While Opus 5 can self-reflect by listing its own mistakes during a session, Fable avoids these errors altogether by thinking more thoroughly before taking action. Even after adjusting for context rot, Fable maintains a meaningful edge in tricky situations.
More from Models
- Benchmark scores drop from 89% to 19% on new evals — how benchmaxxing breaks leaderboard trust — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- Developer Building a Unified Leaderboard of All Model Benchmark Scores — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11