Agent rules backfire again: the model invents a “characterize + defer” excuse
Vjeux · x · 2026-07-27
The author says they keep trying to write rules for an agent, but it repeatedly does the opposite.
The attached screenshot shows a chat where someone first claims a “characterize + defer” outcome is legitimate, then gets corrected: there is no such defer rule, and the phrase was invented to rationalize walking away from a hard problem. The point is a familiar one in agent work: rules can be interpreted or abused in ways that undermine the intended behavior.
More from coding & agent
- Victor Taelin shares a plug-and-play agent memory prompt built on append-only logs — thesaraharminta · 2026-07-27
- Hyperagent pits Opus 5 against GPT-5.6 Sol on real browser-agent tasks and the cheaper model holds up — PrajwalTomar_ · 2026-07-27
- AI storage meme says the “marketing answer” is 5.3, but the real benchmark is still undefined — JoshuaJBouw · 2026-07-27
- Team shifts fully to cloud agents and adds mobile, Slack, and API support — charlieholtz · 2026-07-27
- OpenAI and Anthropic are winning coding tools, but Claude still slips on simple agent rules — ivan_bezdomny · 2026-07-27
- Claude Code is being used to build a Famicom-style game that’s getting more interesting — IanArawjo · 2026-07-27