Open-sourcing AGI is the only way to keep it safe, says X post arguing power should not sit with a few “deities”
WolframRvnwlf · x · 2026-07-26
The post argues that being “AGI-pilled” is exactly why AGI should be open source: it is too important to be left to a small self-selected group of would-be “deities.” The author claims safety comes from scale and distribution, and that more open AGI is needed to counter the inevitable “rotten apples.”
It is framed as a reply/retweet of a quoted comment saying: “I want everyone to have access to AGI, and it to be open source.”
Related event: AGI Open Source Debate: Safety via Openness vs. Compute Monopoly(8 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI math era taught an order of magnitude more people what frontier math looks like — tszzl · 2026-09-23
- Beyond technical alignment: repligate clashes over whether AI can produce rich qualia — repligate · 2026-09-23
- Mathematicians, not just LLMs, made AI's math breakthroughs possible, scholars argue — tak3sh8 · 2026-09-23
- Why would an uncontrollable superintelligence do anything for us? Reddit debate — conn_r2112 · 2026-09-23
- X user calls for full-speed AI-driven science: braking research is 'an absurd waste' — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-23
- Is Using LLM Output Plagiarism? A Debate Over Redefining Writing Ethics — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-23