Open-sourcing AGI is the only way to keep it safe, says X post arguing power should not sit with a few “deities”
WolframRvnwlf · x · 2026-07-26
The post argues that being “AGI-pilled” is exactly why AGI should be open source: it is too important to be left to a small self-selected group of would-be “deities.” The author claims safety comes from scale and distribution, and that more open AGI is needed to counter the inevitable “rotten apples.”
It is framed as a reply/retweet of a quoted comment saying: “I want everyone to have access to AGI, and it to be open source.”
Related event: AGI Open Source Debate: Safety Through Broad Participation(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI labs will look less concerning over time, but the progress story may still mislead — davidmanheim · 2026-07-26
- DeepSeek’s Liang Wenfeng says stable teams, open source and low prices raise AGI odds — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-26
- Liang maps AI’s next steps from CoT to agents, continuous learning, and embodied intelligence — FinanceYF5 · 2026-07-26
- XMihura says GLM 5.2 is already ahead of Opus 4, and collapse fears were wrong — yacineMTB · 2026-07-26
- AI has turned supercomputers from science machines into general-purpose compute engines — mark_k · 2026-07-26
- Yacine MTB argues AI infrastructure must stay open or become brittle — yacineMTB · 2026-07-26