Emollick says dismissing AI safety risks implies labs are faking them for profit
emollick · x · 2026-07-26
The reply says that if you reject these risks, you probably think lab insiders are fabricating them for commercial reasons and regulation. The thread context suggests the debate is really about how seriously people take open-weight models and the AGI/ASI risk model behind biosecurity concerns.
Related event: Open vs Closed AI Debate Hinges on Belief in AGI Risks(7 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Gavin Baker says AI will stay multi-model, and open source is vital to U.S. competitiveness — GavinSBaker · 2026-07-26
- Ben Horowitz says open-source AI is essential as frontier labs push for control — a16z Podcast · 2026-07-26
- A viral Reddit line frames AI as shifting skill access toward capital — churchkey · 2026-07-26
- Steven Strogatz reposts a case for using AI in math without misleading the field — stevenstrogatz · 2026-07-26
- A joke predicts the first AI Oscar winner will make everyone retroactively supportive — taherdhanera · 2026-07-26
- VC says regulators can’t call models “super-intelligent” and also detect distillation themselves — xeophon · 2026-07-26