Anthropic users say Opus 5 is best for complex agents, while Sonnet 5 fits routine coding
dr_cintas · x · 2026-07-26
The post says that after 24 hours with Opus 5, the real question is not whether to raise effort, but which model to switch to for each task.
It recommends:
- Sonnet 5 for everyday coding, drafts, and quick edits
- Opus 5 for complex agentic coding, enterprise work, and long-horizon tasks
- Fable 5 for maximum capability and agents that run for days
It then frames effort as the key lever:
- High-effort Sonnet can become expensive without changing the underlying generalist nature
- Low-effort Opus can already perform well at much lower token and latency cost
- Even low-effort Fable may outperform the previous generation’s high-effort mode, while max effort is where its long-horizon advantage appears
The takeaway is to match task, model, and effort level instead of blindly turning every setting up to maximum.
More from coding & agent
- Cheaper OpenAI Agents API alternative: sandbox service undercutting E2B by 46% — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- His agent kill switch ran for months before he found it was wired to nothing — AnvilandCode · 2026-09-11
- Kernel's Browser Agents Can Now Pay Online Using Aliases, Never Touching Card Data — jeff_weinstein · 2026-09-11
- OpenAI opens up agent sandboxes: BYO or pick from Cloudflare, E2B, Modal, Vercel and more — threepointone · 2026-09-11
- SocialCrawl MCP lets agents search Reddit, YouTube, TikTok, X with one API key — dooddyman · 2026-09-11
- Astra builds a surprisingly polished Catan game in three.js, reusing past UI and 3D assets — FinanceYF5 · 2026-09-11