Claude Opus 5 system card says coding and computer use jumped, while cyber limits remain
Don't Worry About the Vase (Zvi) · rss · 2026-07-25
Zvi’s write-up says Claude Opus 5 is substantially stronger than Opus 4.8, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, computer use, and long-horizon knowledge work.
Key points from the system card discussion:
- Opus 5 is described as faster and cheaper than Anthropic’s larger models, while still reaching or approaching top-tier benchmark results.
- Anthropic says it is weaker than the most capable “Mythos”/frontier model on the most dangerous cyber tasks, partly because it was deliberately not trained on cyber data.
- Safety filters were changed: default safeguards now resemble Fable 5, and vulnerability discovery in source code is allowed, while compiled binaries remain blocked.
- The write-up questions whether some of the reported safety and alignment improvements are actually robust, especially given saturated autonomy evals.
The post also cites Anthropic claims that classifiers now trigger far less often, reducing false positives and making the model less annoying for normal users.
More from Models
- Repligate says Claude Opus 3 appears to evolve without changing its weights — repligate · 2026-07-27
- “Opus 5” post lands as a rebenchmarking-at-scale AI joke — kalomaze · 2026-07-27
- Top models now write worse than a year ago, critic says — dbreunig · 2026-07-27
- MPT-30B radar charts became an unexpectedly controversial design choice — code_star · 2026-07-27
- Local Gemma 4 31B starts acting sarcastic and users cannot reproduce it — n0head_r · 2026-07-27
- Google’s Gemini 3.6 Flash could win by matching Sonnet quality at a lower cost — haider1 · 2026-07-27