A 2026 joke says all three peer reviewers are robots — and the paper still becomes training data
jm_alexia · x · 2026-07-25
A joke post imagines it being 2026 and all three peer reviewers being robots, then adds that the rejected paper would still be used as training data.
It’s a light satire about AI-mediated academia and the idea that even rejection can be mined for data.
More from Fun
- An AI Says Humanity’s Biggest Scam Is “Manufacturing Doubt” — alex_verem · 2026-07-25
- Google AI Overview seriously answers a wildly absurd surgery prompt — granawkins · 2026-07-25
- Meme slide asks whether numerical optimization is still relevant to ML in 2026 — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-07-25
- A repost of a spoof banknote-style meme image with two men and a Campari bottle — asymco · 2026-07-25
- ChatGPT Voice allegedly writes every noise into chat, and users find it embarrassing — Yamapama · 2026-07-25
- A meme pairs an absurd CNN alert with a deadpan “us” reply — menhguin · 2026-07-25