Why many agents fail because they cannot tell whether they are making progress
orvi2014 · reddit · 2026-07-25
A Reddit post argues that most agent failures are not intelligence problems but progress detection problems.
The core claim is that many agents can plan, use tools, and produce coherent intermediate steps, yet still fail because the system lacks a reliable external signal that says whether the agent is actually moving toward the goal.
Typical failure pattern:
- the agent keeps calling tools
- arguments change only slightly each time
- context grows
- self-evaluation stays optimistic
- real progress remains flat
The post suggests more useful safeguards are structural and external:
- hard step/token budgets
- explicit progress predicates
- semantic distance between successive states
- tool-call fingerprinting to detect near-cycles
- separate critic models that judge progress only
The larger argument is architectural: if the model is both the actor and the sole judge of success, better models may just produce more confident and more expensive failures.
More from coding & agent
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11
- Investment Analyst Asks How to Build a Claude-Based Diligence Agent Stack — Careless_Tie2286 · 2026-09-11
- How Do You Catch Behavioral Regressions in LLM Agents Between Releases? — Beautiful_Belt_601 · 2026-09-11
- Treating agents like 50 First Dates: a 3-layer context system so every conversation doesn't start from zero — evielync · 2026-09-11
- Running the Firefox MCP on Android via Termux, ngrok, and mcp-proxy — Nervous-Strain7544 · 2026-09-11
- Run Firefox MCP on Android: Termux + ngrok tunnel tutorial — Nervous-Strain7544 · 2026-09-11