Science may need curators and validators in the age of reasoning bots
rbhar90 · x · 2026-07-25
Science may need to rethink what it means to be a scientist in the age of automated reasoning bots.
The poster argues that the role could shift toward curation and validation: search bots are not living beings, and choosing what matters in research still depends on taste, judgment, and humanity—not just automated answers.
Related event: Automated Reasoning Reshapes the Scientist's Role(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Opus 5 reaches 30.2% on ARC-AGI 3 as critics question the benchmark — ChrSzegedy · 2026-07-25
- X debate says AI reviews could outclass many NeurIPS reviewers by 10x to 100x — peter_richtarik · 2026-07-25
- The next AI battle may be about memory lock-in, not benchmarks — VraserX · 2026-07-25
- Reuters asks whether chatbots will turbocharge cyberattacks and reshape security — wschroll · 2026-07-25
- A 149-page survey says long-horizon agents depend on harnesses, not just bigger models — 机器之心 · 2026-07-25
- AI will cheapen execution and make systems design the scarce skill — AryHHAry · 2026-07-25