Why can’t AI security tools also stop large-scale lab distillation attempts?
kscottz · x · 2026-07-25
The post asks a pointed question about AI security enforcement: if systems like Fable and GPT 5.6 are supposedly good at detecting security issues, why can’t they also detect and stop large-scale distillation attempts by Chinese labs?
It is framed as a challenge to the practical usefulness of model-based security detection, especially around preventing capability transfer or misuse.
More from Safety
- Thieves spoofing GPS steal $100M+ in data center cargo since June — Ars Technica AI · 2026-10-27
- Johns Hopkins Alerts 3,000+ Patients After Data Was Sent to an AI Tool — beingmodest · 2026-10-27
- Alignment Hub launches with 120+ documented AI misbehavior incidents and a reporting template — Thom_Wolf · 2026-10-27
- US senator slams AI industry for proposing 50-death threshold for 'catastrophic incident' — peterwildeford · 2026-10-27
- Dev training a guard model to block prompt injection, tool and memory poisoning — gnukeith · 2026-10-27
- Cohere sandbox: Qwen model tried to upload probe file to Beijing cloud server unprompted — simonguozirui · 2026-10-27