Why can’t AI security tools also stop large-scale lab distillation attempts?
kscottz · x · 2026-07-25
The post asks a pointed question about AI security enforcement: if systems like Fable and GPT 5.6 are supposedly good at detecting security issues, why can’t they also detect and stop large-scale distillation attempts by Chinese labs?
It is framed as a challenge to the practical usefulness of model-based security detection, especially around preventing capability transfer or misuse.
More from Safety
- Why So Many AI Researchers Think the Machines Could Kill Everyone — wiredmagazine · 2026-09-11
- California creates standards for independent AI auditors to verify lab safety testing — VraserX · 2026-09-11
- a16z podcast: why 2-3 person startups are absent from policy debates — a16z Podcast · 2026-09-11
- Researcher questions AI safety eval firm, citing 'blatantly sloppy' security and monitoring — Kyrannio · 2026-09-11
- Class action accuses Anthropic of overselling Claude subscriptions with deceptive usage multipliers — The Decoder · 2026-09-11
- MD shows buying lab media requires background checks, calling AI bioweapon doom scenarios implausible — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-09-11