A thread argues that paperclip-maximizer fears came from a pre-LLM era of AI
repligate · x · 2026-07-25
Jon Stokes argues that classic paperclip-maximizer doom scenarios came from an older era of AI thinking, before LLMs became the default meaning of "AI."
His core point is that people still haven't fully absorbed that modern LLMs are not the value-free, alien, rule-based optimizers that early alignment nightmares imagined. In his framing, the "shoggoth" we were warned about never actually materialized.
The thread is really a critique of how much inherited baggage old AI discourse still carries into the LLM era.
More from AGI Musings
- Instinct launches agent-to-agent protocol to coordinate your plans, sparking 'friction is the point' backlash — itsOmSarraf_ · 2026-09-11
- We are witnessing the unreasonable effectiveness of inference-time scaling — sqcai · 2026-09-11
- Accelerationist fires back at AI doomers: beliefs aren't arguments — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11
- "ChatGPT 6 Makes Workers with IQ Below 130 Useless": French AI Debate Sparks Backlash — mitchdeg · 2026-09-11
- 'AGI is here' vs reality: AI labs still ship some of the jankiest desktop apps ever — MilesCranmer · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11