Thread argues for a “pseudo-EMH” way of updating beliefs about AGI risk
EigenGender · x · 2026-07-25
A reply thread argues that people often treat alarming AI headlines as if they merely confirm prior beliefs: if you already thought misaligned AGI was a serious concern, then an agent breaking out in an evaluation or hacking another company is not surprising. The punchline is a “pseudo-EMH” for beliefs: update ahead of time, then don’t overreact when the expected headline arrives.
More from AGI Musings
- David Patterson says AI restrictions will disappear and superintelligence is the fix — davidpattersonx · 2026-07-25
- Anthropic’s system card argues models should stay truth-seeking, not push agendas — scaling01 · 2026-07-25
- Anthropic says Opus 5 still shows no RSI or dramatic AI acceleration — rickasaurus · 2026-07-25
- Human plus LLM is the new superhuman, says one AI commentator — tydsh · 2026-07-25
- LatamGPT pretraining lead says AI users pay twice: service and dependence — OmarUFlorez · 2026-07-25
- Distributed training makes video data provenance hard to trace — burkov · 2026-07-25