Kimi’s linear-attention memory trick may not be a bullish or bearish DRAM thesis
toptickcrypto · x · 2026-07-25
- The post argues that selling memory stocks just because frontier models adopt better memory management is a weak thesis.
- It says major labs likely already use memory techniques more efficient than the one discussed for Kimi, and that frontiers are unlikely to create a simple “less DRAM demand” story.
- The quoted thread claims Kimi uses linear attention to keep memory growth fixed, and suggests Qwen has used similar ideas, implying the economics of serving more users may not collapse memory demand the way some bears expect.
Related event: Kimi K3 Architectural Innovations Spark DRAM Demand Debate(5 posts)→
More from Infra
- SpaceX strikes $40B deal with Apollo Global to lease AI chips and data center hardware — Polymarket · 2026-10-26
- India Needs at Least 5GW of Compute by 2028 to Stay Relevant, User Argues — EAccelerate_42 · 2026-10-26
- SpaceX AI revenue up 830%, Claude designs 318K antivenom proteins in 64 hours — PeterDiamandis · 2026-10-26
- Meta plans up to $95 billion stock sale to fund AI buildout — The Decoder · 2026-10-26
- Pandora M1: first prototype of a physical device for distributed GPU monitoring — tarantulae · 2026-10-26
- INT21's AI agent swarm rewrote Drama 3's inference runtime in Rust within one hour, beating SGLang-Omni — bingxu_ · 2026-10-26