ARC-AGI-4 should stay private, after Opus 5 scored 3× the next-best model on ARC-AGI-3
burny_tech · x · 2026-07-25
- The post argues that ARC-AGI-4 should probably be kept more private, with far fewer public demos.
- It suggests that many people now assume ARC-AGI progress is being driven by targeted RL environments rather than broad, public benchmark play.
- The quoted context notes that on ARC-AGI-3, a benchmark where models must solve novel problems, Opus 5 scored 3× higher than the next-best model.
- The discussion is less about a product announcement and more about how benchmark design and publicity may affect what progress looks like.
Related event: Opus 5's High ARC-AGI-3 Score Sparks Cheating and Overfitting Controversy(11 posts)→
More from Models
- Astra Scores 83% on GauntletBench, First Computer-Use Agent to Beat Human Baseline — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4 Pro API to continue after Sept 2026, billing unchanged — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Hits 98% of GPT-6 Astra's Score at 1.4% of the Cost in Third-Party Benchmark — ayushtweetshere · 2026-09-11
- TheZvi Polls: Has Your Coding Model Choice Changed Since Fable 5.1 and Astra? — TheZvi · 2026-09-11