Matt Pocock says his /code-review leans on project specs, not generic heuristics
mattpocockuk · x · 2026-07-25
The author clarifies that their /code-review setup does use some generic review logic, mainly Fowler-style refactoring heuristics.
But the important part is that most of the review is delegated to the project’s own coding standards and spec compliance checks, reinforcing the idea that useful review agents need project-specific context rather than a one-size-fits-all prompt.
Related event: Effective AI Code Review Relies on Project-Specific Standards(2 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Alex Townsend posts 200 open problems in numerical linear algebra for humans and AI agents — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11
- Kimi K2.8 Preview rolls out: near-K3 coding performance, 1M context for all tiers — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Looking for a classifier of software engineering task shapes to pick models per task — StewartalsopIII · 2026-09-11
- Steal this idea: prompt-to-hardware where agents assemble custom devices — paraschopra · 2026-09-11
- Model Is the Least Interesting Part: A Guide to Six Core AI Architectures from RAG to Multi-Agent — goyalshaliniuk · 2026-09-11
- Non-coder builds layered memory architecture: 20k tokens tracks a year of agent conversations — matteoianni · 2026-09-11