Matt Pocock says his /code-review leans on project specs, not generic heuristics
mattpocockuk · x · 2026-07-25
The author clarifies that their /code-review setup does use some generic review logic, mainly Fowler-style refactoring heuristics.
But the important part is that most of the review is delegated to the project’s own coding standards and spec compliance checks, reinforcing the idea that useful review agents need project-specific context rather than a one-size-fits-all prompt.
Related event: Effective AI Code Review Relies on Project-Specific Standards(2 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Hands-on: A New Cost-Effective and Fast Model for Agent Workflows — doodlestein · 2026-07-25
- ExploitGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Vulnerabilities — dawnsongtweets · 2026-07-25
- Securing AI-Generated Tools with Cloudflare Access — ritakozlov · 2026-07-25
- A CTO says he is meeting his agent on Zoom, and means it literally — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-25
- Claude Opus 5 reportedly beats Fable 5 on a hard 3D coding test at 75% of the price — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-25
- CTO's Delight: Making AI Agents Attend Zoom Meetings for Me — jacob_posel · 2026-07-25