Claude Opus 5 tops an Artificial Analysis coding-agent benchmark at 67
Hesamation · x · 2026-07-25
A repost reacts to an Artificial Analysis chart comparing coding-agent performance across several models and says Anthropic “really cooked” with Opus 5. The attached image shows Claude Opus 5 at the top of the chart with a composite pass@1 score of 67, tied with Codex GPT-5.6 Sol and ahead of Claude Opus 5 and other models on the same benchmark set.
Related event: Claude Opus 5 Leads Coding Benchmark at Higher Cost(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11