Opus 5 ran about 14% cheaper than Fable 5 on EyeBench-V3, despite using 2.5× more output tokens
adonis_singh · x · 2026-07-25
A follow-up EyeBench-V3 chart says Opus 5 ran about 14% cheaper than Fable 5 overall, mainly because it produced roughly 2.5× more output tokens.
The graphic breaks down the cost dynamics between the two models, showing that Fable is much terser, which narrows the raw run-cost gap.
Related event: Claude Opus 5 Lags in Vision Benchmarks and Cost Efficiency(4 posts)→
More from Models
- GPT-6.1 Terra rolls out to all Plus, Pro, Enterprise and Edu users — OpenAI · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI launches GPT-6.1 Terra with 50% lower API prices than GPT-5.6 Terra — OpenAI · 2026-10-27
- In cyber, intention matters little: Chintala on model info leaks, and what users should do — brhydon · 2026-10-27
- Why don't more LLMs ship 10M-token context? A researcher asks about attention tradeoffs — agarwl_ · 2026-10-27
- Ortet's first health eval: 34 open-weight models, 50 tasks, generic rankings fall short — thegautamkamath · 2026-10-27
- VLM Run launches OCR Playground for side-by-side comparison of GLM-OCR, DeepSeek-OCR-2 and more — spillai · 2026-10-27