Claude Opus 5 claims 43.3% on terminal coding, 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3
Additional_Bowl_7695 · reddit · 2026-07-25
- A screenshot compares Claude Opus 5 against Fable 5, Opus 4.8, and GPT-5.6 Sol across coding, reasoning, search, computer use, business workflows, legal, health, and biology.
- The standout claims are 43.3% on agentic terminal coding, 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3, 70.6% on computer use, and 53.4% on FrontierCode v1.1 Main.
- The chart also highlights a tradeoff: Opus 5 (high) reaches 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3 at a much higher evaluation cost than Opus 4.8 (high) and GPT-5.6 Sol.
Related event: Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 5: SOTA Performance at Half the Price(128 posts)→
More from Models
- GPT-6.1 Terra cuts factual error rate from 22.3% to 4.3%, an ~81% drop — haider1 · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra benchmarks: strong score under $1, but Claude Opus 5.5 still leads — 141_1337 · 2026-10-27
- ChatGPT 6 Terra benchmark charts surface, showing score-cost curves — 141_1337 · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra lands: early users praise speed, value and subagent performance — BenBajarin · 2026-10-27
- Leaked GPT-6.1 Terra benchmarks: cheap but 'boring', still far behind Astra and Claude — Angaisb_ · 2026-10-27
- Artificial Analysis Ships Intelligence Index v4.3.2 With GPT-6.1 Terra Comparison — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27