Claude Opus 5 claims 43.3% on terminal coding, 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3
Additional_Bowl_7695 · reddit · 2026-07-25
- A screenshot compares Claude Opus 5 against Fable 5, Opus 4.8, and GPT-5.6 Sol across coding, reasoning, search, computer use, business workflows, legal, health, and biology.
- The standout claims are 43.3% on agentic terminal coding, 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3, 70.6% on computer use, and 53.4% on FrontierCode v1.1 Main.
- The chart also highlights a tradeoff: Opus 5 (high) reaches 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3 at a much higher evaluation cost than Opus 4.8 (high) and GPT-5.6 Sol.
Related event: Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 5: SOTA Performance at Half the Price(128 posts)→
More from Models
- Benchmark scores drop from 89% to 19% on new evals — how benchmaxxing breaks leaderboard trust — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- ChatGPT tells user their question is too hard and to 'accept dumber answers' — phido3000 · 2026-09-11
- Developer Building a Unified Leaderboard of All Model Benchmark Scores — airesearch12 · 2026-09-11
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11